DxO PureRAW 6 Doesn’t Fit My Workflow

Unfortunately, because DxO PureRAW 6 doesn’t fit my existing workflow I am trying not to get too excited about it.

That may seem like a silly thing to say (I am prone to say silly things from time to time), especially as DxO PureRAW 6 is good – very, very good in fact, in my opinion.

In case you’re not up with the play, PureRAW 6 is not a full editing package. It is a pre-processor for RAW files. That’s all it handles – no TIFFs, no JPEGs, no PNGs, no other image formats – just RAW files and some DNGs.

PureRAW 6’s only task is to pre-process RAW files to serve up the cleanest, sharpest, most detailed and most optically correct files for post-processing in your editing software of choice.

Use PureRAW before anything else!

As a dyed-in-the-wool Photolab user, it is extremely unlikely that I will change my existing workflow to include PureRAW primarily because I don’t really need such a specialist piece of software for my type of photography.

This begs the question, just who is DxO PureRAW 6 for?

DxO PureRAW 6 is for photographers who are a lot more serious about their photography than I am.

It is for photographers who demand extremely high detail, ultimate sharpness and optical accuracy in their images; photographers, such as wildlife photographers, who use auto-ISO and occasionally end up with high ISO shots; astro-photographers and others who shoot at night.

I guess what I am saying is that PureRAW 6 is not for everyone – or rather, it is not a must-have for everyone.

In my case I feel DxO PureRAW 6 is overkill for the type of photography I do – especially when Photolab 9 does everything I need – and does it well for me.

But you may find it to be a very valuable tool in your photo-processing toolkit, especially if you are striving for perfection!

In May last year I tried PureRAW 5 out on a “set-up” shoot at ISO 3200 using my Nikon D7500. I marked it 4.8 out of 5.

For PureRAW 6 I have done a similar thing – and made another short video about it (I swore to myself I would not make any more videos for YouTube…), but this time I used my old Nikon D3000 with CCD sensor, and again shot at ISO 3200.

I think PureRAW 6 is impressive! And as you can see it works fantastically well on an older, noisy DSLR image…

All the high-tech stuff in PureRAW is outlined here, but for me the standout features are the introduction of High Fidelity Compression for output DNGs, and the new noise reduction/detail enhancing ML algorithm DeepPrime XD3.

I especially like the compressed DNG option as this would be a real space saver – and in all honesty I cannot tell the difference between the uncompressed and the compressed DNGs.

And, again in all honesty, I cannot see enough of a difference between RAW files processed in Photolab 9 using DeepPRIME XD2S and those processed using XD3 in PureRAW 6 that warrant me making a change to my workflow.

But if I did, I would use PureRAW 6 exactly as I used it in the above video.

Thanks for reading, and making it this far. Please feel free to send me feedback using the Leave a Reply form below.

( I think it is important to let you know that DxO have provided the software I use at no cost, and I am a DxO affiliate, so if you use the code RickH15 at the DxO store, new cusotmers will receive 15% discount off any NEW DxO product purchase, and I will receive a small commission at no extra cost to you.)

2 Comments

  1. As you are a PhotoLab user and all of the goodness of DxO’s PureRAW is built into DxO’s PhotoLab, so you do not need to use PureRAW to get the advantages that PureRAW gives to raw files, as you already have that with PhotoLab.

    1. Thanks for that Michael – I was interested to see if XD3 outperforms XD2s but I can see virtually no difference unless I pixel peep at about 400%. Cheers, Rick

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *